In the print edition:• Versailles IGA
• CLICK HERE for a short list of articles
• CLICK HERE to view Polar Plunge photos
June 13, 2017 • Headline News
 |
 |
 |
Pick up a copy of the newspaper your local newsstand.
PAGE UPDATED BY MARIA SIEVERDING JUNE 20, 2017 10 A.M.
Attention all clubs and organizations...
Be a part of the 2017-18 Ripley County Guide!
Ripley Publishing Company is currently updating information for the 2017-2018 Ripley County Guide. Over 13,000 copies will be distributed throughout the county. To be included in the guide or to update information that was published in last year’s guide please email the following information by July 18, 2017 to Linda Chandler at lchandler@ripleynews.com.
Please include the following information:
• Organization Name
• Contact Name and Phone Number
• Meeting Day and Time
• Meeting Location
PAGE UPDATED BY MARIA SIEVERDING JUNE 13, 2017 1 P.M.
Water main break in Milan causes problems
Wanda English Burnett
EDITOR
For several customers in the Town of Milan, they were without water for a good portion of Sunday afternoon, June 11. According to John Ingram, town manager, a water main break occurred at State Road 101 near the Fifth Third Bank and caused the water to have to be shut down from 1:00 o'clock until about 4:30 p.m. Ingram said it was just wear and tear on the main and the town water maintenance department had it going in a few hours. However, during those few hours, it was peak time for The Reservation Restaurant. “It’s one of our biggest days,” noted Greg Holt, owner of the restaurant. He said they finally had to close about 3:00 p.m. for the evening. “We are only closed three days a year,” he laughed, saying those are all holidays. However, they were back in operation Monday morning.
Ingram said Milan water customers were advised to boil their water since the main break but it should be over by Tuesday, June 13. They announced the boil advisory on local radio stations and Facebook.
Thinking About Health
Elderly may see drastic cuts in Medicaid, Medicare services
Trudy Lieberman
RURAL HEALTH NEWS SERVICE
Older Americans may be in for a rough ride if the changes Washington politicians are considering come to pass. Because good, explanatory journalism is in short supply and TV shouting matches don’t tell you much, I decided to use this space to discuss some of the possible changes that could soon affect millions of people in their 60s and older.
First, let’s consider Medicaid, the federal-state program that finances healthcare for the poor and long term care for the middle class. Virtually all the talk about cutting Medicaid by more than $800 billion over the next 10 years has centered on the 11 million people who gained health coverage under the Medicaid provisions of the Affordable Car Act, also called Obamacare.
Most of those Americans will lose their health coverage if legislation the House passed in early May to replace Obamacare gets through the Senate. Equally affected will be seniors and their families who now count on Medicaid to fund long-term care. Medicaid pays for about half of all nursing home stays, but it also pays for care elders receive in the community under special waiver programs. These might include home care, adult day care, and other services that help people stay in their homes.
I asked Medicaid experts what would happen if the funds families now depend on disappear. All said that if federal allocations to the states are capped or reduced in some other way, states would have less to give families needing long-term care assistance. More families will be on their own to pay for some or all of the care a loved one needs. The U.S. has never had a policy to pay for such care, so Medicaid, by default, became the vehicle for funding. And as Judy Feder, a professor of public policy at Georgetown University, told me recently Medicaid dollars have never been sufficient to pay for the growing number of Americans needing long-term care. Proposed changes will only make things worse.
Stacy Sanders, federal policy director for the advocacy group the Medicare Rights Center, puts it this way: “Cuts of this magnitude will end Medicaid as we know it, putting older adults’ access to home and community-based long-term care, nursing home services and other essential supports in jeopardy.”
Also, people now receiving health coverage under the Affordable Care Act could find themselves paying much higher premiums if a bill to repeal and replace eventually passes. The House-passed bill changes the rules for insurance companies so that they can charge older people a lot more than younger ones in states that decide to opt out of certain Obamacare protections.
In a state that opts out, according to the Congressional Budget Office, a 64-year-old with an income of $26,500 could pay as much as $16,000 in annual premiums while a 21-year-old with the same income might pay only $1,700. People would get tax subsidies depending on their age, but subsidies gradually phase out the higher the income, still leaving older people with a large premium. While this is only an illustration, it’s fair to say they would take a pocketbook hit. They’d be hit again if a state rejects Obamacare rules that require insurers to cover people with pre-existing conditions. If they no longer could buy coverage, they’d have to turn to state high-risk pools, an old-fashioned solution that didn’t work well.
And then, what about Medicare? One of the biggest changes so far is the elimination of Medicare State Health Insurance Assistance Programs also known as SHIPs. Over 7 million people annually seek help from the SHIPs to understanding Medicare and choose Medigap policies and Medicare Advantage plans. Because this program may disappear, if you think you’ll need help with Medicare, I suggest you check in with your local program as soon as possible.
Other services seniors rely are also on the chopping block. The Trump administration’s budget calls for cuts in rental and heating assistance. Rental assistance for low-income families would affect some 250,000 households that receive housing vouchers, and the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities estimates that about 60,000 of those households include seniors. The Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) may also disappear. About 40 percent of eligible households include at least one person aged 60 and older.
Cuts to the food stamp program; and the elimination of federal funds to states through what’s called a block grant will also mean some meals on wheels programs will have a harder time serving seniors. Directors of meals programs told me waiting lists in some communities will be much longer. At stake is what kind of life Americans want for their oldest citizens? Pamela Tainter-Causey, the communications director for the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare, offered one answer: “We are saying that seniors are becoming the forgotten class.”
Would seniors you know be affected by the changes being considered? Write to Trudy at trudy.lieberman@gmail.com.
PAGE UPDATED BY MARIA SIEVERDING JUNE 20, 2017 10 A.M.
Attention all clubs and organizations...
Be a part of the 2017-18 Ripley County Guide!
Ripley Publishing Company is currently updating information for the 2017-2018 Ripley County Guide. Over 13,000 copies will be distributed throughout the county. To be included in the guide or to update information that was published in last year’s guide please email the following information by July 18, 2017 to Linda Chandler at lchandler@ripleynews.com.
Please include the following information:
• Organization Name
• Contact Name and Phone Number
• Meeting Day and Time
• Meeting Location
PAGE UPDATED BY MARIA SIEVERDING JUNE 13, 2017 1 P.M.
Water main break in Milan causes problems
Wanda English Burnett
EDITOR
For several customers in the Town of Milan, they were without water for a good portion of Sunday afternoon, June 11. According to John Ingram, town manager, a water main break occurred at State Road 101 near the Fifth Third Bank and caused the water to have to be shut down from 1:00 o'clock until about 4:30 p.m. Ingram said it was just wear and tear on the main and the town water maintenance department had it going in a few hours. However, during those few hours, it was peak time for The Reservation Restaurant. “It’s one of our biggest days,” noted Greg Holt, owner of the restaurant. He said they finally had to close about 3:00 p.m. for the evening. “We are only closed three days a year,” he laughed, saying those are all holidays. However, they were back in operation Monday morning.
Ingram said Milan water customers were advised to boil their water since the main break but it should be over by Tuesday, June 13. They announced the boil advisory on local radio stations and Facebook.
Thinking About Health
Elderly may see drastic cuts in Medicaid, Medicare services
Trudy Lieberman
RURAL HEALTH NEWS SERVICE
Older Americans may be in for a rough ride if the changes Washington politicians are considering come to pass. Because good, explanatory journalism is in short supply and TV shouting matches don’t tell you much, I decided to use this space to discuss some of the possible changes that could soon affect millions of people in their 60s and older.First, let’s consider Medicaid, the federal-state program that finances healthcare for the poor and long term care for the middle class. Virtually all the talk about cutting Medicaid by more than $800 billion over the next 10 years has centered on the 11 million people who gained health coverage under the Medicaid provisions of the Affordable Car Act, also called Obamacare.
Most of those Americans will lose their health coverage if legislation the House passed in early May to replace Obamacare gets through the Senate. Equally affected will be seniors and their families who now count on Medicaid to fund long-term care. Medicaid pays for about half of all nursing home stays, but it also pays for care elders receive in the community under special waiver programs. These might include home care, adult day care, and other services that help people stay in their homes.
I asked Medicaid experts what would happen if the funds families now depend on disappear. All said that if federal allocations to the states are capped or reduced in some other way, states would have less to give families needing long-term care assistance. More families will be on their own to pay for some or all of the care a loved one needs. The U.S. has never had a policy to pay for such care, so Medicaid, by default, became the vehicle for funding. And as Judy Feder, a professor of public policy at Georgetown University, told me recently Medicaid dollars have never been sufficient to pay for the growing number of Americans needing long-term care. Proposed changes will only make things worse.
Stacy Sanders, federal policy director for the advocacy group the Medicare Rights Center, puts it this way: “Cuts of this magnitude will end Medicaid as we know it, putting older adults’ access to home and community-based long-term care, nursing home services and other essential supports in jeopardy.”
Also, people now receiving health coverage under the Affordable Care Act could find themselves paying much higher premiums if a bill to repeal and replace eventually passes. The House-passed bill changes the rules for insurance companies so that they can charge older people a lot more than younger ones in states that decide to opt out of certain Obamacare protections.
In a state that opts out, according to the Congressional Budget Office, a 64-year-old with an income of $26,500 could pay as much as $16,000 in annual premiums while a 21-year-old with the same income might pay only $1,700. People would get tax subsidies depending on their age, but subsidies gradually phase out the higher the income, still leaving older people with a large premium. While this is only an illustration, it’s fair to say they would take a pocketbook hit. They’d be hit again if a state rejects Obamacare rules that require insurers to cover people with pre-existing conditions. If they no longer could buy coverage, they’d have to turn to state high-risk pools, an old-fashioned solution that didn’t work well.
And then, what about Medicare? One of the biggest changes so far is the elimination of Medicare State Health Insurance Assistance Programs also known as SHIPs. Over 7 million people annually seek help from the SHIPs to understanding Medicare and choose Medigap policies and Medicare Advantage plans. Because this program may disappear, if you think you’ll need help with Medicare, I suggest you check in with your local program as soon as possible.
Other services seniors rely are also on the chopping block. The Trump administration’s budget calls for cuts in rental and heating assistance. Rental assistance for low-income families would affect some 250,000 households that receive housing vouchers, and the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities estimates that about 60,000 of those households include seniors. The Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) may also disappear. About 40 percent of eligible households include at least one person aged 60 and older.
Cuts to the food stamp program; and the elimination of federal funds to states through what’s called a block grant will also mean some meals on wheels programs will have a harder time serving seniors. Directors of meals programs told me waiting lists in some communities will be much longer. At stake is what kind of life Americans want for their oldest citizens? Pamela Tainter-Causey, the communications director for the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare, offered one answer: “We are saying that seniors are becoming the forgotten class.”
Would seniors you know be affected by the changes being considered? Write to Trudy at trudy.lieberman@gmail.com.
